| 
        	
        		|  |  
        		| 
                    	
                    		
                   		 
                    		| Published since 1990, Sound Mind Investing is America's best-selling financial newsletter written from a biblical perspective.  Visit the Sound Mind Investing Web site.  Request a free information packet regarding the Sound Mind Investing newsletter.  Investigate the widely-acclaimed Sound Mind Investing book, available at a 35 percent discount!  |  
                    		|  |  |  Smart Investing    Picking the Right Stock to Bond Mix 
 CBN.com 
		   What determines the  performance of your investment portfolio more than any other single factor?  Most investors think it's picking good stocks and stock funds. Certainly that  can make a big difference, and that's why we suggest using a proven strategy  like Fund Upgrading to help make important buy/sell  decisions. 
		 But, as important as this  is, it's not the most influential. All the great stock funds in the world won't  have much impact on your portfolio if you only have 10% of it invested in  stocks and the other 90% is in money market funds. With that in mind, perhaps  you can see why your most important investment decision is how much of your  portfolio is allocated to stock investments and how much is to fixed income  securities like bonds. Academic studies over the years have established that as  much as 90% of your long-term results can be traced to this fundamental  allocation decision. A portfolio's  stock-to-bond mix does more than dictate future returns  it also tells you a great  deal about how those results are likely to be obtained. Look at the charts linked to below: Charts: Volatility Goes Down When Your Bond Allocation Goes Up	  The vertical lines represent the returns for  each calendar quarter between 1989 and 2003, ranked from worst to best.  Starting with Chart A, you can see that a 100% stock portfolio is going to  provide many quarters of big moves, both up and down. The other charts reduce  the stock portion in increments of 20% each, putting that money into bonds  instead. This has the clear effect of narrowing the range of results. Not only are the bars on  the other graphs smaller (illustrating that the gains and losses of these  portfolios are less extreme), but the frequency  of negative returns declines as well. The 100% stock portfolio suffered  quarterly losses in 28% of the periods shown compared to 17% of the time for  the portfolio invested just 20% in stocks. It's safe to say, then, that the  more bonds in your portfolio, the smoother the ride. By contrast, the higher  your stock allocation, the more you can expect returns to come in a "two  steps forward, one step back" fashion. If owning stocks subjects  you to greater swings in performance and produces losses more frequently, why use them at all? Because that's where the  biggest long-term gains are! The net effect of all those stock market ups and  downs is greater overall returns, which you can see in the average annual  returns of the charts.  So, on the one hand, we  have stocks, which are volatile but produce high returns. On the other we have  bonds, which are relatively stable but produce lower returns. How should you go  about combining them in a portfolio? The key ingredient in this  recipe is time. Over shorter periods,  stock returns are much more variable. Maybe you'll do great; maybe you'll do  poorly. Given a long time frame, however, you can be very confident that stocks  will provide higher returns than bonds. Here's a good example to  illustrate this point. Think about tossing a coin. You know that the  probability of getting heads on any single toss is 50%. So if your goal is to  get 50% heads, then what matters most to you is having a lot of tosses. If there are only going to be two tosses,  you should be much less confident of getting 50% heads than if there are going  to be ten tosses. With 100 or 1,000 tosses, your confidence should grow  correspondingly that the long-term averages will emerge.  So it is with investing.  The more years ("tosses") you have ahead of you to invest, the more  confident you can be that you'll benefit from the higher average returns stocks  have historically provided. The less years you have to invest, the more you  need to protect against the possibility that the results over your shorter time  period may not match the long-term averages. That's why it's generally  recommended that younger investors take advantage of the many  "tosses" in their future by investing exclusively in stocks. They can  afford to ignore the short-term ups and downs, while racking up the highest  long-term returns possible. Later, as you move closer to retirement and the  number of future tosses declines, it's prudent to scale back the short-term  risk of loss by gradually increasing the percentage of bonds held in the  portfolio. Hopefully this article  helps clarify the relationship between volatility and expected returns, and how  the allocation of a portfolio is the primary driver of both. If you're nearing  the end of your investing time frame (whether for retirement, college, etc.),  this information should give you confidence that you can keep growing your  money at a reasonable rate even if you do the prudent thing and increase your  bond holdings to reduce the chance of short-term losses.  On the flip side, if you  still have many years to invest, hopefully this will liberate you from worrying  about what the market will do in the short-term as you ramp up your stock  allocation to take advantage of the higher long-term returns stocks have  historically provided. 
 In our Sound Mind Investing newsletter, we try to regularly emphasize why we are here serving you in this  way: We want to help you to have more so you can give more to share the good  news of Christ's love with the world. 
 
 CBN IS HERE FOR YOU!Are you seeking answers in life? Are you hurting?
 Are you facing a difficult situation?
  A caring friend will be there to pray with you in your time of need. |